About Me

Name: Optimus Magnus
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Did Rules Ever Matter to the Nazis?

The word 'Nazis' refers to the National Socialists who hold majorities in both houses of Congress.  Let ye not forget that this is who they are.  So, the Sanders Amendment was withdrawn from the Senate Health-Care Destruction Act debate without so much as a peep from the 'Republicans'.  It is yet another illustration of why the party which 'takes the high road' consistently gets clobbered.  Oh, what got them clobbered in the first place?  They spent like liberals, that's what.
 
If the democrat controlled Senate has no qualms about breaking Senate rules where the reading of an amendment is concerned, is it really that much of a stretch of the imagination to say that the long-form birth certificate rule was swept under the rug as well?  Remember, Barry Soetoro announced his candidacy under a democrat controlled Senate.  Barry was the perfect vehicle to get the Executive Mansion precisely because that campaign was based on using 'white guilt' to get enough votes to carry him through.  If that wasn't enough, then the illegal-alien vote (thanks to ACORN) was going to be.
 
I will make a prediction which I pray to God is wrong:  there will be no mid-term elections in 2010.  Per Article One, Section Four, paragraph one:  "The Time, Places, and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators."  Don't you think for one minute that the dems won't exploit this.  Yes, I am aware that Section One spells out that the elections are to happen every two years, but this doesn't matter to the dems (who will NEVER be capitalized in this blog).  They've broken at least two Senate rules.  Why should some silly 'living, breathing document' be an impediment to them?  These people will create a crisis that will preclude there being elections next November.  They've got their power back and they are (danged) if they are going to take a chance on letting it go. 
 
How do we counteract this?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dear Former Actress Formerly Known as Meredith Baxter-Birney

So what?
 
I don't CARE that you like women.  The fact is that you played the mom--not the 'mother', the MOM--on one of the greatest family-oriented sitcoms ever.  Your character held the line when Alex (God love that Conservative character) lipped off about being eighteen years old and could do what he wanted.  Mrs. Keaton was all about professing love.  Ms. Baxter, when you and the cast sang "In My Life" on the final episode of Family Ties, it was all I could do not to cry.  I loved your work so much.  Kudos on your vocals, by the way.
 
Your coming out made me ask, "Why?"  After all these years, why do I need to know your orientation?  Oh, by the way, I am  a FLAMING heterosexual.  I just thought you should know.  It still befuddles me, though.  Did someone in Hollywood dig up some dirt about you and blackmail you with it?  It just doesn't make sense to me how an actress like you who seemingly keeps to herself just suddenly decides to hold a press conference just to come out?  Did Perez Hilton and the rest of his ilk threaten you?
 
My friends aren't Balkanized.  Some of them happen to be gay.  Some are 'flaming', while others just live their lives and never let on their sexuality unless they happen to mention their 'roommate'.  I love them all.  There also is a former co-worker of mine who couldn't go two seconds without mentioning something about being gay; it really pushed my tolerance and he delighted in the fact that his 'victim status' could (and did) open doors for him.  He pushed it onto everyone else.  The irony is that his boyfriend and fling both were just ordinary folks who wanted to live and let live.  Ms. Baxter, I'm not convinced that your coming out was your idea.  I think some in the militant wing of the gay community saw a chance to stick one in the eye of the straights, as if to say, "Ha-ha, we were in your living room back then, too." 
 
In conclusion, Ms. Baxter, I wish you nothing but a life of love, joy, peace, and happiness.  Oh, I also hope that, every month, you get a nice, big, fat royalties check from all those episodes of Family Ties because, by goodness, you earned it!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time to Do Time

As a Conservative, I don't give a rat's arse what your age, color, sex, religion, race, or sexual orientation is.  If you're a lib, keep your politics to yourself while I rightfully re-educate you in Conservatism, aka The American Way.
 
That said, it's WAY past time to start prosecuting people who make false charges of rape.  Isn't it against the law to defame someone?  Look at the lives who are destroyed, or at least seriously damaged, by such BS allegations!  Tawana Brawley, Crystal Gail Mangum, and now Donmell Ndonye have much for which they need to answer.  They must do time.  Well, the SOL may have lapsed on Brawley; God will take care of her and her conspirators.  As for the other two, though, it's high time that we get them arrested, booked, and JAILED.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Battered-Voter Syndrome

At the age of fifteen, I had to have a girlfriend.  It didn't matter who she was or what her character was truly like, so long as I had someone who was dating me.  She just had to be someone who liked me
 
As it turned out, she was ungodly possessive.  She had to know where I was and what I was doing twenty-four seven.  I had no time to myself.  For much of the time we dated, she was seeing a mutual friend of ours behind my back, I later learned.  When anyone tried to point out to me just what a DUD she was, it only provoked a defensive and hostile reaction from me.  No matter how hard people tried to convince me, I just could not be made to realize that, while I did have a girl of my own, I had chosen the wrong one.  I was in complete denial about my choice.  I went around doing my best to convince myself and everyone else that she was the only one, ever, for me.  Even when I was totally sick of her, I still hung on to that relationship, convinced that no one better would ever come along.
 
My blindness was not realized until after she was done using me as arm candy.  When I finally reached that point after the split where I could listen to people telling me her character flaws, I was furious with that Beatle-spec wearing geek in the mirror.
 
The reason I say all this is to draw a parallel between my own experience and that of the sheep who voted for then Senator Soetoro.  I don't recall having worn a George W. Bush t-shirt or hat a full two months after either the 2000 or 2004 elections, nevermind TEN months afterwords.  These people suffer from a combination of Buyer's Remorse and Battered-Mate Syndrome.  They will stop at no end to convince themselves that they made the right choice last November.  Not even over-taxation will change their minds.  Only when Soetoro's Marxist policies finally wreak havoc upon their lives will they get an inkling that they may have chosen wrong.  Then again, though, Soetoro's media will come to the rescue by reminding these sheep that everything bad that ever happened in their lives is all George W. Bush's fault.  Sadly, some of them won't learn even after they die as a result of their relationship with such a man because Obamacare's Death Panels decided they weren't worth saving.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Racial (Muck)-Stirring

I have come to the conclusion that the sole function of the Cesspool of Non-News (CNN) is simply to stir up (muck) among non-White/non-Asian groups.  I saw a blurb showing how babies are supposedly making judgements about people based on the colour of people's skin--at the age of six months!!  Are you (passing) me?  One, how do the 'researchers' know this?  Did they ask the babies, who so graciously gave hard-hitting interviews in between bouts of chain-smoking and binge-drinking?  Two, what purpose does this 'report' (and I use the term very loosely) serve, other than to keep the (muck) stirred up?  Three, CNN is racist.  They above all networks work the hardest to remind the supposedly oppressed groups just how far 'Whitey' is keeping them down.  Why else would they insist on doing shows on what it's like to be 'Black in America'?  Can you imagine the absolute holy hell that the left would raise if Fox were to do a series on what it's like to be 'White in America'?  Do you know that Whites are denied loans at higher rates than are Asians?  Where's the expose' on that?  You know why there isn't one?  Because most everyone knows that Asians, by and large, have a two-word work ethic:  Work hard.  Besides, if Whites are shown to be outclassed by another group, it blows that whole whites-as-oppressors thing right out of the water.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

(Gosh-Darn) It, Stop Apologizing!

Note to Joe Wilson:  bravo to you for possessing the 'testicular fortitude' to call Obama on it when he lied.  Also, shame on you for apologizing for it.  This is what makes us look like cowards.  Reagan pointed the way for us by taking stands and sticking to them come hell or hight water.  Are we going to be a party of opposition or not?  Don't worry about your re-election.  According to Glenn, you get paid for the rest of your life after just serving one term.  This ought to be an incentive to ENGAGE the enemy and stick to your positions.  People speak of how complex it would be to restore Constitutional government as it was originally intended by the Founding Fathers.  I have read the Constitution enough times to know that there is no right not to be offended.  Do you realize what kind of campaign commercial was just wasted by that apology?  We need to engage the libs at every level, dig for dirt, and root these worms out.  Let's fight the libs on their own terms.  This means we slam at every opportunity.  This means that Fox should go totally right wing or at least start a one hundred percent Conservative network, with Rush as its anchor.  No libs allowed.  I would bet it beats out FNC for ratings!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Reverse' Discrimination?

What is it with folks who want to mitigate discrimination against white folks (usually men) by calling it 'reverse' discrimination?  Is it somehow just part of my genetic makeup to discriminate against anyone who isn't like me because I'm white?  The name implies that is simply expected of me to exclude someone on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, orientation, disability, grandmother's virginal status, etc., etc.  Discrimination is what it is.  By deeming such actions as 'reverse', people are saying that somehow it isn't as hurtful, that someone didn't get screwed as badly, and that the victim had it coming because he/she was white.  The term is racist.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dead...And That's The Way It Is

(Originial working title:  "Walter Cronkite:  Hero of the Viet Cong")
 
Ideally, news should be kept separate from commentary (and vice-versa).  Just tell me what happened.  You report; I decide.
 
If 2008 was "the year journalism died" (Hannity), then February 27th, 1968 was the day it contracted inoperable cancer.  Cronkite's denunciation of the Vietnam War has been given perhaps the most credit for turning the tide of public opinion against military operations against the Communists in Southeast Asia.  It was nothing less than the most egregious abuse of power and popularity by "the most trusted man in America".  Yes, he had the right to speak, but he did NOT have the right to editorialize without explicitly labelling his commentary for what it was:  the journalistic malpractice of presenting opinions as news. 
 
Yes, I realize that journalistic malpractice is now the norm and that Fox News is just a freak show channel because they at least make a decent attempt to present both sides of a problem, although I find them to be 60/40 lib/Conservative.  The Communist News Network is trying to paint the rosiest picture of him by focusing on the JFK report and the moonshot.  Meanwhile, Larry King's guest, Ava Braun-Couric, is focusing on the denunciation of the war and doing her (darnedest) to glorify that moment.  It is time to call Cronkite's moment of infamy what it is:  it is the greatest propaganda victory ever scored in the history of warfare.  When you can get your enemy's most trusted voice of information to denounce their war against you, all that remains is to wait for the tide of public sentiment to turn against your enemy. 
 
General Giap of the North Vietnamese Army recently released a collection of memoirs.  In them, he stated that the Tet Offensive, contrary to what has been believed for years over here, actually set the Viet Cong back several years.  We CLOBBERED them!  General Giap also stated that, had we kept up Operation Linebacker II for just two more weeks, the North would have had no choice but to surrender.  We had them on the ropes, folks.  We were winning!!!  Thanks to Goebbel-ites like Cronkite, et al, the American public was duped into believing that the war was a lost cause.  How many millions of people died because of Cronkite's treasonous actions and their ripple effects?  Rest assured, when the news broke that Cronkite was dead, I did not shed one bloody tear.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Shooting From the Hip

For years, I have described shopaholics as people who are trying to fill empty holes in their lives.  Another year has passed for me recently.  Here I sit at this keyboard with seven Matchbox/HotWheels cars in front of me.  Sure, I'm fascinated with cars.  Many of the cars depicted by my collection of replicas are machines that I don't have a hope in all get out of ever owning.  So, by owning a likeness, an idol perhaps, I can kid myself that I do own one of (fill in the year, make, and model).  To someone else, I might say, "Do you realize how much money you could put towards retirement if you just stuck that money in the bank?  Why can't you be happy with what you already have (and do not stop to appreciate)?" 
 
You know, I said in a recent post that libs don't always get it wrong.  For example, when attacking materialism, libs are very fond of asking someone of affluence the question, "How much is enough?"  I'll be lambasted for saying this, but that is a legitimate question.  The best comeback to that question is, "I'll know it when I've got it."  I believe that this is for the individual to decide.  (Note to the car companies:  bring back 'cars a la cart'--pun intended.)  How will I know when I have enough, though?
 
Why can't I be happy with what I already have?  Have I conditioned myself to believe that no matter how much I have, it will never be enough?  Forgive me, my Conservative family, but maybe Obama is just what we need as punishment for losing sight of what is truly important in life.  Our economy is built upon people spending money they don't have to buy things they don't need to impress people they don't even like.  Common sense tells us this is wrong; at least, it does when we are looking at someone else doing it.  Michael Jackson, God rest his tortured soul (for that is indeed what he truly was), helped to point the way to me when he sang "Man In the Mirror".  He told me to take a look at myself.  Due credit also to Robert Plant for asking me if I liked what I saw.  I've been on a bookstore/cheeseburger bender lately.  Even though I can actually afford the spending I am doing, I'm collecting reading material faster than I can ever hope to read it.  I'm chomping cheeseburgers faster than I can burn them off.  I am also collecting cars to the point where I've got duplicates because I forgot I had a certain (fill in the blank) in a particular colour already.  I can't do this anymore.  I must stop awhile and take stock of what I have, enjoy it, and thank GOD for lending me this stuff.
 
Do you know why people on both sides of the aisle despise Sarah Palin?  She actually clears the bar set so high for Conservative politicians; she forces many people to look at themselves and see that they don't measure up to her.  She's faithful to Todd, just like I am faithful to my wife.  She is Trig's mom.  She is a woman who scraped and scrapped to earn her degree by going to several different schools and transferring the credits (the same way many of us do).  She lives up to the ideal of pulling herself up by the bootstraps and making something of herself.  She is unafraid to take a risk such as walking away from (until now) the biggest job of her career.  She is fiscally frugal AND socially Conservative.  (For those of you in Rio Linda, she "walks the talk".) 
 
Why do we love her so much?  As stated in the above paragraph (in so many words), she is one of us.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Diminishing Returns

It's not as though it really matters now, but here's something else I wrote some time back:
 
What constitutes an acceptable level of NOx emissions?  This is something an engineer needs to seriously contemplate when addressing the problem of reducing the dependency on foreign oil.  (Is it possible we can use up theirs while conserving ours?)  Lean-burn, variable-valve-timing technology was perfected (and on the market) by Honda in 1995.  Sure, NOx levels were up compared to the LEV engines, but it still met T-LEV standards.  How clean does the air have to be?  Surely we have long ago passed the point of diminishing returns. 
 
Allowing thirteen states to set their own emissions regs would be an unmitigated disaster.  Pension funds notwithstanding, Ralph Nader's brigade bears a large chunk of the blame for the current state of our auto industry, what with having to conform to totally unrealistic CAFE and tailpipe standards.
 
Something else that doesn't help is the forcing of wealthy people to pay what is, in effect, a double-tax on their petrol consumption (Gas-Guzzler Tax).  Rich people get rich not by throwing away their money, but by being consummate models of frugality with their capital.  Besides, don't those folks who drive large and/or hi-performance cars already pay a gas-guzzler tax?  After all, gasoline taxes (indeed, all excise taxes) are consumption taxes.  Why penalize people for enjoying what they've earned?  (Class envy, that's why.)
 
There is an unintended consequence when it comes to frugal cars:  they encourage people to travel more.  It's a simple axiom of economics:  when you can do something more cheaply, it encourages that activity.  A 20 mpg car going forty miles burns no more fuel than a 40 mpg go-kart travelling eighty miles.  Assuming per-gallon emissions are equal, what has been gained other than mobility?  The exhaust pumped out is the same.
 
The libs' prevailing approach to taxation has nothing to do with maximizing revenue; rather, it is directly tied to a desire to control people's behavior.  To their detriment, they stubbornly refuse to accept that they can have it both ways by relaxing emissions standards and abolishing CAFE altogether.  Such a move would free up Detroit from having to build crud-cars which no one wants to buy.  (Detroit has never done small cars well.)  In fact, by relaxing (or at least removing all the mandates from) all the arbitraty standards, all companies and consumers would benefit from the vast array of available choices.  (What I still wouldn't give to be able to own a Suzuki Cappucino or a first-generation Opel Tigra.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Are NOT Alone

 
The above was written in the style of someone speaking from a liberal point of view.  I'm certain the author is actually one of our people.
 
Sometimes, I get reminders of why I shouldn't sit on things that come from my pen.  I actually composed the following at work several weeks ago.  The above author does a much better job of reinforcing his point than I do mine.  Due credit to the professional; I'm just an ex-Math teacher.
 
From 'several weeks ago':
 
Kudos to John Ziegler for calling the counterfeit Contessa Brewer the liberally-biased pseudo-journalist that she is.  Ziegler grasps an idea which I have been preaching for several years:  civil debate over politics is dead.  We are now engaged in a street-fightin', knock-down, drag-out gang war and we are losing.  We are losing because our side is clinging to some outdated notion of 'not wanting to stoop to their level' and the delusion that if we just lighten up, they will like us.  We are fighting by Queensberry rules and judiciously avoiding making any 'low blows', while the left is beating us with sticks, throwing mud (and sometimes food) in our eyes, and knee-capping us at every opportunity.  Meanwhile, it is left to turncoats like 'Colon' Powell (because he's full of it) to knife us in the back after the ONLY party that was ever going to help him out promoted him to his current place of prominence without first vetting him to see where he actually stood on anything (out of fear of us being called racists, perhaps).
 
Regarding the GOP, Conservatives have two options.  Option One is to take over the party and kick the Rockefeller blue-bloods OUT.  We also need to bolster our movement with some Conservative judicial activism.  We need to appoint people who will return us to Constitutional government by any means necessary.  Anyone in our party who doesn't see it our way can get lost.  Option Two would be to form a bona fide Conservative party with 'Life, Liberty, and Property' as our platform.  We have AM radio.  We own talk radio in general.  We're on equal terms on the Internet.  We could well do it.  Let us not be deceptive with our party's name.  We are Conservatives.  We must dismantle the over-bloated parts of our Federal bureaucracy.  This means that the Departments of Education and Energy must be the first ones to go.  Bye-bye IRS.  We must have the FairTax and we must END welfare in this country as we know it. 
 
 
(That is almost entirely word-for-word what I wrote down at work on scratch paper.  I regret not having dated the thing.)
 
Now, as for Sarah:  God-speed to you and yours.  You are in my prayers.  To any libs who might read this:  November, 1962.  After losing the California governor's race, former Vice-President Nixon famously said, "You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore."  Five years later, the Great Society Guy "(did) not seek and (would) not accept the nomination of (his) party to be (our) President."  Remember that this was during his first term having been elected.  Your guy will crack.  Biden was right:  the White House is no place to be conducting "on the job training."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blessings in Disguise

Steve Miller once wrote that, "You've got to go through Hell before you get to Heaven."  Well, with their super-majority, the Dems can do as they dem-well please.  This may turn out to work in our favor, provided our reps can galvanize themselves into a true opposition party and oppose everything the Dems propose to the detriment of our country.  I don't like the idea of Democrats with no effective opposition, but their not needing us just might be what we need.  Whatever they pass on a single party vote, they own, baby.  The crucial thing for our party not to do, is blow it by becoming pro-big-government.  That's what went wrong this last time.  We must push the FairTax.  We also must educate people about basic economics.  (Fox News could help by giving Dr. Thomas Sowell or Dr. Walter Williams their own econ educational show.)  I stress the need for education because I actually had to explain tort reform to a former COP!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Justice System Failed George Tiller

Because the politics of abortion were put before the shattered lives of young girls, many an investigation into likely criminal wrongdoing was prevented.  The very probable reality that Tiller failed to report crimes of statutory rape would have been enough to put Tiller behind bars, where he would still be alive today. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nice Try, Communist News Network

I can't recall the name of the propaganda-gal who said it, but there was a deliberate misquote yesterday of Sotomayor.  The word 'different' was substituted for 'better' when her controversial quote about the ability to make decisions was being discussed.  Y'know, the one where she said that (to paraphrase) a Latina woman would make better decisions than a white male because of experiences.  I caught it not because I was looking for it, as the libs will say, but because I was listening as well as watching. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Word Clouds? What the (devil)?

The Communist News Network is foisted upon us as 'news' in my workplace.  During an analysis of the speeches by Cheney and Obama, the CNN presenter actually showed collages in red and blue made from words taken from each person's speech.  I thought I was back in third grade.  Are you (passing) me? I thought.  It was not lost on me when the biggest word in the red cloud was 'terrorist' and the blue cloud's biggest word was 'people'.  It would have been more apropos had 'people' been in red.  Knowhutamean?  Don't tell me that they weren't trying to go for a subliminal angle either, otherwise, they would have had side-by-side transcripts with names in the same font.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »